Mgusto4north

Members
  • Content count

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Mgusto4north last won the day on September 4 2014

Mgusto4north had the most liked content!

About Mgusto4north

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday
  1. Thanks Dick, I appreciate the info. I am located in Minnesota and will see what I can do to take the course. I saw that they had some online training, but don't think I will get that lucky, so I may have to take a trip to where the class is offered.
  2. I plan to use a John Deere 310 backhoe loader to run some old tailings through a wash plant that can process upto 40 yards/hour. I would say I will mostly be sampling in nature during next summer. I don't plan to have any employees and will be located in fairly remote Alaska where I have a few claims. Can anyone explain what types of MSHA requirements would apply to me operating on my claims? Am I required to have training? on site inspections? Several other medium size mines in the area state they have never done anything with MSHA nor seen them in the area. It would be easy to ignore, but I want to follow the rules as best I can. I realize there are other agencies/applications but my question is directed towards MSHA requirements. I have tried to sort through their website and like many government agencies, it is not really very clear. Thanks in advance. Mike
  3. Hi Geo, I am rooting for your success! Do you think having a little higher capacity wash plant, say 40 or 50 yds/hr would make a big difference? IF not, what one or two things do you think contributed the most towards losses? I am just looking to educate myself better. Thanks!
  4. Hi Darrel, Correct me if I am wrong but I believe the part that you are asking about is the actual washing of gold along the ground to get to the sluice. Geowizard describes a small location where he found some pay that the hydraulic miners washed along and then missed (he has a good logical explanation in his post). He didn't state any approximate dimensions for this find so I am not sure how large an area it was. I would guess that this happens occasionally. I have to wonder when they got down to bed rock, using high velocity water caused much random displacement of gold. In some instances maybe they used a dozer to scrape through some of the bedrock. I would suspect there is some gold still in the bedrock, but difficult to say how much. Lots of variables! Looking at it from another perspective, I have read some of the early USGS reports for different areas in alaska. Numerous times comments state that the old timers re-worked an area. But it usually doesn't say much more than that. A few times there have been comments that say the old timers went back and reworked the perimeters of the original paystreak. I just can't find enough details to conclude that the oldtimers re-worked the "original paystreak location" or some "other location". Just my 2cents
  5. Can you confirm that you are finding 0.010 ozt to 0.020 ozt troy per yard? or is this kind of an unusual hot spot? mgusto4north
  6. Hi Geowizard, Have you been able to find pretty consistent values through out a given tailing pile? or is it better at the top? I think I read some where, maybe in the USGS reports, that Ophir had been worked a second time. Not sure if this means the tailings piles or if it means that major parts of the bed rock have been re-worked a second time. One would tend to theorize that the bedrock might be good to sample as the dragline/dozer couldn't exert much downward pressure (as you have noted in previous posts). I assume that the original bedrock channels are not covered by much overburden as I don't think the early miners did much reclaiming (I could be wrong).
  7. That looks really nice Chris! Did you find this spot with your metal detecting or did you perform some type of sampling to locate it? I am always curious how people find their paystreaks.
  8. Hi Steve, Wow! those are nice! I'll bet it never really gets old when you dig a target. I enjoy reading your stories and looking at the pictures you share. May you continue to have great success and please keep sharing.
  9. Hey Chuck, You crack me up! Ya, a neoprene exoskeleton isn't like the suits from the "Iron Man" movies. I have never run a 6" but the 5 does have great suction. I chased down stream several times to recover my left snap-in-place drysuit glove, filling my left arm with unmistakable glacier run off in the process. keeps one feeling alive! One could burry the nozzle and keep it burried but the sluice starts to quickly load up. Running it at 1/3 throttles still created great suction and also helped keep the nozzle from eating the next 5.001" rock! I had originally planned to get a 4" but got a good deal on this 5". When I finally got it loaded in the suburban, I kind a wondered what I might have gotten my self in for (see attached picture).
  10. Hi Geowizard, I plagiarized you 5 gallon bucket sampling idea a few years back from your older posting or the Alaska forum can remember (Please forgive me-kudos to you). It is a great way to caluculate yardage for sampling. I only used one 5 gallon bucket (which increases sampling error). Due to the fast current, it takes a while to fill a 5 gallon bucket, shovel maybe even provides a little sluicing action while under water-adding possible error. As with any statistical analysis, increasing your sample size, improves your representation of the population being sampled. Here is a picture of me running the dredge at the Petersville, AK Recreational site
  11. Hi Chris! Wish I had a fraction of your knowledge when it comes to mining. Thanks for the compliment. I guess Lady gaga lives for the applause but I sure do live for the adventure! I spent 4 days sampling last year with just a sluice box. There was a small area that calculated out to about 0.01 ozt/yard. Now keep in mind I was using a 5" Keene dredge rated at 10 yds/hr. Hmmm! I am not sure where they get this rate from, maybe if it was sand which was loosened with a rotor tiller and and no big rocks-lol. I would speculate that I may have been running more like 4 maybe 5 yds per hour. So this is roughly around 48 yds processed which should of yielded closer to half an ozt. But I suspect my production rate was lower and there are so many factors that can cause error in sampling. I did use a calibrated enclosed scale to try and minimize measurement error (fringe benefits from where I work).
  12. Thanks for the positive feed back Gold Seeker. Writing doesn't come so easy for me, but I have been inspired by others' stories and hope that may I can do the same from time to time.
  13. Thanks for the compliment Geowizard. From your website (and Alaska Mapper), I can see you are a very busy person. I don't know where you find the time to write so much, but it speaks volumes of your good character (so that others can enjoy and maybe even learn). Your posts on the mine at Ophir are very interesting and provoke much thought (and spreadsheet analysis )! Keep the rocks moving and hope you find another Nugget Patch, Mike
  14. It is an honor to have you reply Leonard, I have seen some of your videos and enjoyed many of your stories. I hope that you have many more adventures to come. After getting some sleep, I decided to do a clean out on the 2 hr run to see if the ground I had pre-sampled was adding up. With the assistance of the desert fox, I separated out much of the gold (still have a few ziplock bags of concentrates in garage). It came to just over 1.5 pennyweights. Not too bad considering that I wasn't able to use my full face dive mask (no air) and was basically long arming the nozzle. I must have spent atleast 20% of my time removing rocks from the nozzle and clearing rock jams. I suspect a lot of this would have been avoided had I been able to see and move the rocks before they entered the nozzle by actually being under water. Plus, as you all know, it takes a tremendous amount of energy to remove the jams. I slipped into my drysuit with renewed sense and got back to work. I put in 8 hours, dringking 1 whole gallon of lemonade between the rock jams. I sat down next to the dredge and inspected the 1st stage to see some nice little fines looking back at me. It took a while to muster up the energy to walk the very short distance to the truck. needless to say, it took a while to get out of the drysuit, but i felt much better as we had some supper. The next day I awoke and decided I needed to take a break from dredging and do some hiking. I had looked over google earth many times about getting further up cottonwood creek. Due to there being too much snow on the road, it wasn't possible to drive the truck in. We ventured up several feeder streams to see if there was any large scale activities going on with the hopes of getting permission to do a little panning. we ended up putting in a little over 12 miles round trip. It was neat to see the large scale equipment that was set up in a couple of areas. Being the mechanical type I had to study it more with dreams of someday having a big operation. It was pretty much raining all day so it was nice to finally get back to camp. The next morning I let my 18 year old son run the dredge so I could self-promote to supervisor. A couple of hours of smiling and wrestling the rocks and he was ready for luch. It was still raining and had rained all night. as we ater our lunch I was worring about the road conditions and if we would be able to make it out. So we decided to pack up the dredge and head out. Sure enough, the road conditions were somewhat worse. Just a few miles shy of making to he fork in the road, were meet the worst section stopping to get out and walk through a plan of action. I knew we needed to carry some speed to make it through until I hit a few bigger bumps and slowed down. While, to make a long story short, the front wheels made it to good ground but the back wheels were burined. Luckily, there was abottom to the mud (which is very different from the mud here in Minnesota). We persisted with the shoveling and rocking techniques finally getting out. It was a good upper body workout with the truck now fully camouflaged with mud. There rest of the road was in pretty good condition. I look forward to getting back there again next year and enjoyed the awesome views. We went through the concentrates and did pretty good. The approximate 12 hours of nozzle time yielded 0.37 ozt. Here is a picture of the Petersville, Ak gold. The camera makes it look more chunkier than it really was, but forme, it was still awesome.
  15. Though this is my 1st post, I would like to take a moment to thank many people for posting stories and info. I have followed many of your stories for years (Steve H., Geowizard, Chickenminer, Leonard, Reno Chris, Manvsgold and many more). If you hadn't taken the time to write or post videos, I would not have learned so much! I live in Minnesota and have made annual trips to Alaska for more than 18 years now (unfortunately, these have been only 2 weeks in length). You would think I'd have moved there by now but certain circumstances can keep us from our dreams. The trip started out with me arriving in Anchorage on May 19 and then flying to Homer where I keep my truck and boat. I had purchased a used 5" Keene (3-stage w/air) from a you fellow living near Fairbanks. It was a long drive and even though I always feel in a hurry, I stopped at Hurricane gulch, venturing to the bottom with my pan and shovel. I think I have read Wendt's book "Where to find gold in Alaska without getting shot" about a dozen times over the years so I was eager to check it out since he gives it a fairly high rating. Lots of big boulders and exposed bedrock and the occasional snow bank. I spent about 1.5 hrs sampling here and there within the road right of way and only manage to find a few colors. I figured the ascent would only take about an hour as the descent took all of about 10 minutes. At 46 years of age I consider myself to be in good physical condition. However, I under calculated the incline and think it took nearly an hour and a half. Making the mistake of accidentally grabbing a handful of Devils club did cost about 10 minutes (to remove said prickers from ones hand). Once I was just about to the top I came across a small opening where there were 2 hunters (checking their bear bait) both had drawn their side arms, thinking I was a bear. Thank fully they re-holstered their guns once they saw me and a friendly conversation perspired . Pheww! so much for the title of Mr. Wendt's book! I made it up to Fairbanks and managed to shoe-horn the 5" dredge into the back of my suburban and anxiously return back towards Anchorage where I picked up my son from the airport. I also stopped by AMDS to see if by chance they had a T-80 crank shaft in stock (the air compressor was not pumping air and upon dis-assembly found the eccentric bearing had worn and wrecked the shaft). AMDS could order one but I passed since I was only in AK for 1.5 weeks. We headed out to Petersville utilizing 4 wheel drive frequently and finally made it at about 10pm. Most people would have gone to bed, but I was set on making good use of my vacation (yes, I typically rest when I get back from my AK trips due to over doing it-this trip was to be No Exception!). Piecing the dredge back together fulling both engines with gas, I had to put 2 hours in before I decided it was a good idea to get some rest (I was really the fact that it started getting dark, that caused me to shut down). Boy, compared to my 2.5 Keene, this 5" with 2 P-180s with suck the glove right off my dry suit. It was a struggle with out air as I couldn't avoid sucking up the big rocks, which wouldn't even fit in the nozzle but required arm wrestling to remove (Yes, I know they make rubber flapper nozzles just for this, but some thing to buy later). I estimate that my production was reduced by 20% just from the lost time of removing the rock jams (need to weld reduced ring around the nozzle). To be continued.